sales06@switek.biz
+86 186 5927 5869
| # | Name | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Product Name | IMLBox |
| 2 | Material | PP |
| 3 | Mould Cavities | 4 |
| 4 | Cycle Time | 15 |
| 5 | IML Robot | SW833-19 |
| 6 | IMM | 268 Ton |
| # | Name | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Mould Time | 0.8~3 s |
| 2 | Dry Cycle Time | 2 s |
| 3 | Power | 6.2 (KVA) |
| 4 | Input Power | AC220V/3P |
| 5 | Working Pressure | 5~7 |
| 6 | Air Consumption | 10(NL/Cycle) |
| 7 | Net Weight | 900 kg |
| 8 | Gross Weight | 1500 kg |
| # | Name | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | X1 | 190 mm |
| 2 | X2 | 190 mm |
| 3 | Y | 400 mm |
| 4 | Z | 2100 mm |
| 5 | L | 2730 mm |
| 6 | W | 2410 mm |
| 7 | A | 1280 mm |
| 8 | B | 2260 mm |
| 9 | H | 1720 mm |
YIZUMI P350 or P380K3, which one would be a better choice for your IML project?
P350 is a high speed injection molding machine designed for thin-wall containers while P380K3 is the third generation of high speed injection molding machine by YIZUMI designed for thin-wall containers. With 30 Tons more in clamping force, does it mean that P380K3 will compatible to the molds designed according to the parameters of P350?
In one just finished IML project we encountered something embrassing. There's one mold designed according to the parameter of YIZUMI P350, and we have a P380K3 in our system testing workshop, but when the mold received we find that the mold thinkness exceeded the max mold thickness of the P380K3. After double check the parameters of both the injection molding machine we found that Mold thickness allowed for P350 is 300~750mm while the mold thickness for P380K3 is only 250~650mm. And the Max Daylight of P380K3 is 160mm less than P350.
Then how to choose between, which one would be a better choice for your IML project? It would be depends on the size of the parts of which you're producing. For smaller container 30 Tons more clamping force with 160mm less max daylight means that the injection molding machine will have a less mold Open/Close time and result in a higher productivity while for larger size containers P350 will allow you to install a thicker mold, it would be more friendly to an IML project of deep cavity containers.
For more insights of the cutting edge IML technology please feel free to contact Adams from SWITEK, your personal consultant of IML Solutions.
How to make a round IML cup as a perfect subsitution of the two compartment cups as the container for the Yogurt products with mate? MengNiu Group has a price smart solution.
As the second largest dairy products producer in China, MengNiu Yogurt products are one of the most popular Yogurt products among the weight loss population. With balance of dietary fiber and the protein, the new "Chewing Mate" series of Yogurt products won the popularity among the office ladies immediately as soon as it's put in the market. Unlike its European counterparts to have a two compartments cups as the container of their new Yogurt products, MengNiu choose a round IML cup but with a large cap as the container of the "Chewing Mates" to provide more dietary fiber for the beauty lovers.
The high light of this package solution is that it's a really price smart scheme compared to the two compartments cups. As the basic IML solution, it's possible to have a system of 4/6/8/12 cavities at a cycle time of around 5.5~6.5s and the cost of the IML solutions is much lower than the IML solution of the two compartments cups for which has 3 labels to be labeled. With mass productivity, the round wrapping IML cups has a overwhelming price competitiveness against the two compartmnets IML cups. It's also a safe products to start a new IML business. More importantly, as a round cups, the cost of integration of the other automation unit like vision control or auto-packing would be much lower and easy to start up, it's getting more and more popular among the Yogurt containers producers.
Injection Machinery News & Express
E-mail: sales@switek.biz
Injection Machinery
CopyRight © HuangYanZheng